If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only carried out When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case law is specific to your jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. As an example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and a hundred and twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
The official court record is maintained through the court of record. Copies of case file documents are usually not accessible over the search site and will need to become ordered from the court of record.
Only a few years ago, searching for case precedent was a difficult and time consuming endeavor, necessitating persons to search through print copies of case legislation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search alternatives, and plenty of sources offer free access to case law.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children from the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents in the boy or Female will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they are able to cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually very well-settled that although taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of each of the eligible candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part on the respondent department.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law in a particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its individual set of binding case legislation. Because of this, a judgment rendered within the Ninth Circuit will not be binding in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
ten. Based over the findings of your inquiry committee, this petition just isn't considered maintainable and is particularly therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may very well be one particular or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason for the decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited here as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted within an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.